Section 13b of the ftc act
Web21 Apr 2024 · In addition, the hearing addressed the Commission’s imperiled consumer redress authority under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act and the agency’s continuous efforts to combat COVID-19-related scams. As we have previously written , the Supreme Court is set to decide the scope of FTC’s Section 13(b) authority to obtain a permanent injunction and … Web27 Apr 2024 · Federal Court: The FTC can sue in federal court under §13(b) of the FTC Act to enjoin a defendant when the defendant “is violating, or is about to violate” a law that the …
Section 13b of the ftc act
Did you know?
Web22 Apr 2024 · The bill amends Section 13(b) of the FTC Act to makes explicit the FTC’s longstanding authority to obtain injunctive and equitable relief, including monetary redress … Web21 Apr 2024 · In addition, the hearing addressed the Commission’s imperiled consumer redress authority under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act and the agency’s continuous efforts …
WebReferences in Text. This Act, referred to in text, is act June 19, 1936, ch. 592, 49 Stat. 1526, popularly known as the Robinson-Patman Antidiscrimination Act and also as the … WebAfter it first gained statutory authority under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act to bring suit in federal district court to preliminarily enjoin conduct that “is violating, or is about to violate” …
Web26 May 2024 · The aforementioned Congressional Committee is currently working on draft language for a new Section 13(b) of the FTC Act. Acting Chairwoman Slaughter’s letter … Web26 Apr 2024 · Prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling, the FTC has used its § 13 (b) power in both consumer protection and antitrust litigations to secure federal court orders requiring …
Web23 Apr 2024 · On April 22, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a long awaited decision that rejects the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) longstanding use of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act to obtain equitable monetary relief in federal courts. The Court’s unanimous (9-0) decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission …
WebAMG Capital Management, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission is a U.S. Supreme Court case about whether Congress gave the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) the power to request that a federal court order people who violate the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA) to pay equitable monetary relief in the form of restitution or disgorgement. In a unanimous … 15坦克Web2 Oct 2024 · On September 30, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed a district court’s order of $448 million in disgorgement, concluding that disgorgement is not … 15地震Web26 Jan 2024 · Federal Trade Commission, in which the Court grappled with the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) authority to obtain equitable monetary relief pursuant to the … 15坦克装甲Web22 Apr 2024 · Section 13 (b) which was added to the Act in 1973 and allows the FTC to proceed directly to court (before issuing a cease and desist order) to obtain a … 15基地Web3 Dec 2024 · Section 13(b), by its text, authorizes the FTC to seek temporary and permanent injunctive relief in federal court for violations of the FTC Act, including Section 5 violations. 15城建01Web27 Apr 2024 · The FTC Can Seek Restitution Under Section 19 of the FTC Act. Although the FTC has been authorized to enforce the FTC Act through administrative proceedings … 15城六局Web5 Oct 2024 · No. 18-2621 (3d Cir. Sept. 30, 2024), ruling that the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania erred in requiring AbbVie and Besins to disgorge $448 million in … 15基線